
By Robert Phillips
Deputy District Attorney (ret.)
One of the many important decisions trial judges must make is the setting of bail for pre-trial defendants. Political considerations in today’s often-contentious world may sometimes attempt to influence the trial judge’s discretion in this area: one end of the spectrum demanding that absent a conviction, all criminal defendants must be set free, while on the other end, hardline bail opponents point out the dangers to society of allowing potentially violent defendants – convicted or not – back onto the streets. A recent case from California’s Supreme Court – In re Kowalczyk (Apr. 30, 2026) Cal.5th [2026 Cal. LEXIS 2206] – attempts to find that fine line between these two extremes, citing in the process long-standing California constitutional principles.
In this new case, Gerald John Kowalczyk was caught in January 2021 trying to buy a hamburger with someone else’s stolen or lost credit card, or actually six credit cards. After the first five were declined, the ....
Create a free Basic account to unlock the rest of this article and stay current on California & federal rulings.