
By Robert Phillips, Deputy District Attorney (Ret).
A prosecutor’s failure to use the pronoun with which a defendant chooses to identify (i.e., “misgendering”) constitutes prosecutorial misconduct.
“Misgendering:” The word of the day, particularly for prosecutors in trial. This word is defined by Merriman-Webster as the practice of “identify(ing) the gender of a person, such as a transsexual or transgender person, incorrectly, as by using an incorrect label or pronoun.” “Misgendering” is further defined by the First District Court of Appeal (Div. 3) in the recent case of People v. Zarazua (Nov. 21, 2022) __ Cal.App.5th __, at fn. 1 [2022 Cal.App. LEXIS 956], as “the assignment of a gender with which a party does not identify, through the misuse of gendered pronouns, titles, names, and honorifics,” citing as its source 109 Cal. L. Rev. 2227, 2232, authored by Chan Tov McNamarch, and entitled “Misgendering.”
In Zarazua, Ms. Mareza Zarazua was a woman in April, 2019, when she fled from police as they tried to stop her for the simple traffic offense of not having a rear license plate. After a 15-minute pursuit, she ....