Subscriber Question: Is Viewing Video Acceptable Probable Cause for Misdemeanor Arrest Committed Outside an Officer’s Presence?
  • Ref # CAB10123
  • January 24, 2026

Subscriber Question: Is Viewing Video Acceptable Probable Cause for Misdemeanor Arrest Committed Outside an Officer’s Presence?

From the Classroom
By Ray Hill
Professor Emeritus, Santa Rosa Junior College 

Legal Issue 

Viewing Video Footage as Probable Cause to Arrest for a Misdemeanor Committed Outside an Officer’s Presence 

This article is written in response to question posed by Sgt. John Johnson of the San Diego County Sheriff’s Office: “Could you address when it comes to misdemeanor arrests, specifically video surveillance as “in presence.” 

Many thanks to Bob Phillips, Deputy District Attorney (retired) San Diego County District Attorney’s Office, for his contributions to this article. His responses are included along with references to The Fourth Amendment and Search and Seizure: An Update (February 2025) available exclusively to our Pro Subscribers. 

Discussion 

Under 836(a)(1) P.C., “in presence” is commonly interpreted as ....

Keep reading this bulletin update

Create a free Basic account to unlock the rest of this article and stay current on California & federal rulings.

Coming up in the rest of this article
  • What in presence actually means under PC 836
  • The retail-theft carve-out the legislature added
  • Whether violating the rule actually costs you the evidence
No credit card required · 2 free case updates per month
Sign Up