The Premeditation Element of Burglary Cannot Be Presumed

The Premeditation Element of Burglary Cannot Be Presumed (Peo. v. Myles (2023) 4DCA, 2023 WL 2607483, 2023 Cal. App. Lexis 214). 
By: Ray Hill, Professor Emeritus, Santa Rosa Junior College 

This case is not the biggest burglary in the annals of criminal justice history, but it emphasizes the proper approach in proving the premeditation element of 459 P.C. This case got reversed on appeal, not because of bad police work, but because of erroneous jury instructions given by the trial judge. The case will be remanded back to San Diego County Superior Court for retrial. The good part of this decision is that the Fourth District Court of Appeals ruled “there is sufficient evidence in the record from which a rational trier of fact could find the specific intent element of the charged offenses”.  So the prospects for a second guilty verdict or plea bargain look good. 

The defendant, Mr. Myles, was a homeless and mentally unstable man, who was a crime-oriented “pain in the butt”. The San Diego County DA’s Office took his prosecution seriously. He ended up being convicted and sentenced to 14 years / 8 months in prison for Burglary 1st Degree; Attempted Burglary 1st Degree; Committing a Crime While Out on Bail/O.R. (a 245(a) P.C. offense occurring April 2020 where he assaulted a store clerk after stealing cigarettes) and having a ....