The Premeditation Element of Burglary Cannot Be Presumed

The Premeditation Element of Burglary Cannot Be Presumed (Peo. v. Myles (2023) 4DCA, 2023 WL 2607483, 2023 Cal. App. Lexis 214). 
By: Ray Hill, Professor Emeritus, Santa Rosa Junior College 

This case is not the biggest burglary in the annals of criminal justice history, but it emphasizes the proper approach in proving the premeditation element of 459 P.C. This case got reversed on appeal, not because of bad police work, but because of erroneous jury instructions given by the trial judge. The case will be remanded back to San Diego County Superior Court for retrial. The good part of this decision is that the Fourth District Court of Appeals ruled “there is sufficient evidence in the record from which a rational trier of fact could find the specific intent element of the charged offenses”.  So the prospects for a second guilty verdict or plea bargain look good. 

The defendant, Mr. Myles, was a homeless and mentally unstable man, who was a crime-oriented “pain in the butt”. The San Diego County DA’s Office took his prosecution seriously. He ended up being convicted and sentenced to 14 years / 8 months in prison for Burglary 1st Degree; Attempted Burglary 1st Degree; Committing a Crime While Out on Bail/O.R. (a 245(a) P.C. offense occurring April 2020 where he assaulted a store clerk after stealing cigarettes) and having a Prior Strike Conviction (a first degree burglary conviction in December 2019).  

In May 2020, the defendant broke a kitchen window to access a latch and entered an Oceanside residence. The home was in probate proceedings. A father and son lived away from the residence, however visited the residence periodically for maintenance purposes. After entry, the defendant unplugged the touch screen module for the house alarm, placed it face down, and remained in the house for approximately 15 hours. During this time, he consumed a box of juice, a can of ginger ale, and ate ice cream belonging to the homeowner. The homeowner’s van was parked in the garage with a dead battery. Defendant charged the battery and drove the van to a Circle K where he purchased malt liquor, then drove back to the residence and parked the van in the driveway.  

The homeowner was in Los Angeles when he received a surveillance ....

© 2026 Legal Updates, LLC.
This content is protected by copyright law. Republishing or redistribution in any form without written permission is strictly prohibited. For licensing or reprint requests, contact support@legalupdates.com.