
In the previous California Legal Update (Vol. 24, #11, Oct. 28, 2019), my brief of a Fourth District Court of Appeal (San Diego) decision, People v. Lee (Oct. 3, 2019) 40 Cal.App.5th 853, brought forth a number of (sometimes) irate (“don’t kill the messenger”) responses concerning the impounding of vehicles. As I noted in my brief, Lee specifically held that despite the existence of authorizing statutes (e.g., V.C. § 14602.6(a)(1)), it is a Fourth Amendment violation to impound a vehicle and conduct a subsequent warrantless inventory search unless such an impoundment is also allowable under the so-called “Community Caretaking Doctrine.” In Lee, the defendant was caught driving while his license was suspended. Among the arguments the People made in Lee in attempting to justify the warrantless impoundment and inventory search of defendant’s vehicle was that § 14602.6(a)(1) authorizes such a procedure. The Appellate Court ruled to the contrary. Per People v. Lee, to be lawful, the impoundment of a vehicle must be both authorized by statute (such as V.C. § 14602.6(a)(1)) and in compliance with the Community Caretaking Doctrine. (pp. 867-869.) (Lee also stands for the proposition that an inventory search of an impounded motor vehicle, when done for the purpose of finding evidence of ordinary criminal wrongdoing as opposed to merely protecting the owner’s personal possessions, is illegal. See also United States v. Johnson (9th Cir. 2018) 889 F.3rd 1120, 1125. ....