
The standard for an officer’s pre-search knowledge that a suspect is subject to a Fourth Amendment waiver search is probable cause.
A law enforcement officer needs only to have “probable cause” to believe that a person is on active parole before that person may be searched pursuant to a parole search condition. However, arbitrary, capricious or harassing parole searches are prohibited by California statutory and case law.
Pursuant to the “collective knowledge doctrine,” information possessed by one officer may be imputed to another when the officers are either working together or one is acting at the direction or request of another.
Defendant Christian Alejandro Estrella is a documented gang member belonging to the Angelino Heights Sureños, a criminal gang based in Santa Rosa, California. Having served prison time for an unspecified offense, he was paroled to Lakeport, California. On July 2, 2018, he visited the Lakeport Police Department to register as a convicted gang member, as required by Penal Code §186.30. When Officer Tyler Trouette, Lakeport P.D.’s gang specialist and a member of the Lake County Gang Task Force, was notified that there was a new gang member in their city, he “familiarized himself” with Estrella’s criminal history.
On July 3, the day after Estrella registered, Officer Trouette visited Estrella at his home, where they discussed the conditions of his parole, such as not associating with a gang and not wearing gang attire. It was specifically mentioned that Estrella was not to wear an Oakland Athletics baseball cap. This is because, as both Estrella and Officer Trouette knew, the A’s baseball cap is commonly worn by members of the Angelino Heights Sureños because, to members of the gang, the “A” on the hat signifies “Angelino,” as opposed to “Athletics.”
Officer Trouette subsequently made periodic contact with Estrella’s parole officer, discussing the terms and conditions ....