
By Robert Phillips
Deputy District Attorney (ret.)
LEGAL CONCEPTS:
RULES:
(1) Law enforcement may use “peer-to-peer file-sharing platforms” that can be used to distribute child pornography to identify those who possess child pornography and are offering it for public download. A search warrant is supported by probable cause if, based on the totality of the circumstances, the application establishes a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.
(2) A Fourth Amendment search does not occur unless the defendant manifested a subjective expectation of privacy in the object of the challenged search and that society is willing to recognize that expectation as reasonable. Individuals do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in electronic files they offer for public download.
(3) The forensic analysis by law enforcement of a defendant’s electronic devices is not a “critical stage” of a criminal proceeding, thus negating the need for a defendant or his representatives to be present during such analysis.
(4) A defendant in a child pornography case is not the victim of selective prosecution just because he or she has prior convictions for crimes against children. Also, convicted sex offenders do not comprise a “suspect class” for purposes of selective prosecution.
(5) A defendant is not entitled to a judgment of acquittal absent any evidence to support his argument that any element of his conviction was inadequately supported by the evidence.
ONE-MINUTE SUMMARY: ....