
Police officers violate the Fourth Amendment when they allow a police dog to continue biting a suspect who has fully surrendered and is under the officers’ control.
Officers from the San Jose Police Department, including one with his K-9 partner, responded to a domestic violence call on September 10, 2019, at the home of Zachary Rosenbaum; plaintiff in this lawsuit. Upon arrival, Rosenbaum’s domestic partner told the officers that the plaintiff was under the influence of alcohol or narcotics. She also told them that he had previously owned firearms although she believed that they had since been destroyed in a fire. The officers were further informed that plaintiff had fought with the police during a prior domestic violence incident and that he was trained in mixed martial arts and boxing (allegations plaintiff later denied). (Neither the details of this particular alleged “domestic violence” incident, nor whether they were relayed to the officers, not being in issue, were not mentioned in the decision. However, the officers apparently believed they had enough information to arrest the plaintiff.)
Presuming that the plaintiff might offer some ....