Deadly Force, Liability and Negligence Highlight Circuit Court Decision in Nevada Case
Robert Phillips
Robert Phillips
  • Ref # CAC10036
  • March 22, 2025

Deadly Force, Liability and Negligence Highlight Circuit Court Decision in Nevada Case

Legal Issues and Case Law

Fourth Amendment, excessive force, qualified immunity
The Graham factors and the use of deadly force
Fourteenth Amendment deprivation of a familial relationship
A constitutional violation prerequisite for Monell liability
Battery and negligent wrongful death actions under Nevada law
 

Rule: Whether deadly force used by a police officer is constitutionally lawful depends upon whether it was objectively reasonable for the officer to believe that the amount of force employed was required by the situation. A reasonable, even though mistaken, belief that deadly force is necessary under the circumstances precludes any civil liability on the part of a police officer. An officers’ actions in killing an uncooperative suspect must “shock the conscious” for Monell (employing entity) relief to be available. A Nevada state action for battery and negligent wrongful death under state law applies only when the officers acted in bad faith.

Facts: Around midnight on Oct. 27, 2018, several people called 911 to report a man walking around a Las Vegas residential neighborhood carrying what appeared to be a “slim jim,” “long stick,” or “machete.” The man, later identified as Lloyd Gerald Napouk, was seen talking to himself, rising his fist at parked cars, pointing the object he was carrying at houses, and going into backyards and peering into windows ....

Court Case Name
Napouk v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (9th Cir. Dec. 10, 2024) 123 F.4th 906
Link
Sign Up