Aiming an unloaded firearm at an officer constitutes force or violence under the wording of knowingly resisting an officer statute (69(a) P.C.)
  • Ref # CAC10136
  • March 31, 2026

Aiming an unloaded firearm at an officer constitutes force or violence under the wording of knowingly resisting an officer statute (69(a) P.C.)

Case Alert  
By Raymond Hill  
Professor Emeritus, Santa Rosa Junior College  

Legal Issue and Case Citation 

Aiming an unloaded firearm at an officer constitutes force or violence under the wording of knowingly resisting an officer statute (69(a) P.C.) 

Summary: This decision goes into detail about a contentious confrontation between a defendant (a convicted felon) and California Highway Patrol officers, Sonoma County sheriff’s deputies, and a Sonoma County Regional Parks ranger. The crux of the decision is as follows:  

Facts: A California Highway Patrol officer in Sonoma County observed two individuals in a parking lot engaged in a confrontation. The defendant was holding a knife and the other was holding a rock. After several orders, the defendant complied with the officer’s demands to discard the knife, engaged in a heated exchange with the officer (who was ....

Keep reading this case update

Create a free Basic account to unlock the rest of this article and stay current on California & federal rulings.

Coming up in the rest of this article
  • The two distinct ways to violate PC 69(a)
  • Whether present ability is required for a resisting charge
  • The brandishing/245(a)(4) line for unloaded firearms
No credit card required · 2 free case updates per month
Total Page Load Time: 0.2767 seconds
Sign Up