Skip to main content

Be Social

Home

LEGALUPDATES.COM

Trusted Resources
X
  • Home
  • OUR TEAM
  • JOBs/Classifieds
  • Training Portal

User account menu

  • Login
  • Search

Editorials

Trial by Zoom - Special Attention Judges & Trial Attorneys

Robert Phillips
8 Jan 2023
CAE00019

By Robert Phillips, Deputy District Attorney (Ret)

Trial by Zoom:  Ahhh . . . , the wonders of modern technology.  In this era of everyone’s possible exposure to COVID-19, and considering the nature of jury trials where judges, attorneys, defendants, jurors, and witnesses, along with anyone else from the general public who might wander in to see what’s going on, all pushed into the close confines of a courtroom, it’s a wonder that communicable diseases aren’t spread more often than they are.  But one federal district court judge in Nevada came up with an innovative solution when the possible threat of a COVID-19 exposure reared its ugly head in her courtroom, as described in the unpublished Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal decision of United States v. Knight (9th Cir. Jan. 4, 2023) 2023 U.S.App. LEXIS 87.  In Knight, a juror in a robbery trial that was just about to begin reported to the court that his wife was sick at home, and that he may have been exposed to COVID as a result. Hoping to find a way not to interfere with the process of the trial, the judge proposed to the parties that they select one of three options: (1) Temporarily delay the trial; (2) excuse the juror in favor of one of the alternates; or (3) allow that juror to see and hear the evidence at home via a “Zoom” set up where that juror could participate remotely through a real time video and audio set up. 

The defendant, through his attorney, chose Door #3; the Zoom procedure, specifically (and repeatedly) acknowledging that he understood it was his choice, that he had the right to insist on all twelve jurors being physically present, and that by agreeing to the Zoom procedure, he was waiving that right. Knowing this, he specifically waived his rights in this regard.  Convicted on multiple counts of robbery, and sentenced to over 14 years in prison, the defendant had a change of heart, appealing his conviction and arguing that the Zoom procedure constituted what was described as “structural error.” As such, defendant argued that allowing him to waive his right to have all 12 jurors physically present was reversible error.  “Structural error,” as explained by the Court, is defined as one that deprives a defendant of the “basic protections without which a criminal trial cannot reliably serve its function as a vehicle for determination of guilt or innocence,” and “def[ies] analysis by harmless error standards” because (a) the right at issue protects some interest other than avoiding erroneous convictions, (b) the effects of the error are difficult to identify or measure, and/or (c) the error is of a nature that “always results in fundamental unfairness.”

The Ninth Circuit assumed without deciding that a criminal defendant has a constitutional right to the in-person participation of a full panel (i.e., 12) of jurors during trial. However, the Court held that there is no indication in the record—and no reason to suppose—that the remote participation of a duly empaneled juror interfered with the functioning of the jury, somehow making that juror partial or unrepresentative, or otherwise impacting the procedures used for the presentation of witnesses. The Court further held that allowing a juror to participate remotely does not impact the entire framework of the trial in ways that cannot be accurately measured on review. The Court also explained that none of the errors defendant alleged in his appeal would necessarily arise simply because a juror is participating remotely.  Lastly, the Court also noted that there is no case law or other authority to support a presumption that the remote participation of a juror would necessarily render a trial unfair and the resulting judgment unreliable. 

In sum, the Court found that if error at all, having a juror participate remotely did not constitute “structural error,” and that given his knowing and intelligent waiver, he has no right to complain on appeal. Good rule for judges and trial attorneys to know.

Read More

P.O.S.T. Certified Law Enforcement recommended by Legal Updates!

TOP Rated training

PETALUMA POLICE DEPARTMENT IS SEEKING LATERAL OFFICERS

PETALUMA PD

TEHEMA COUNTY IS HIRING FOR DEPUTY SHERIFF AND CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS

 

TehemaDS

 

Home

LEGALUPDATES.COM

Trusted Resources

LEGALUPDATES.COM
1968 S. Coast Highway
Laguna Beach, CA 92651

(877) 266-4003

info@legalupdates.com

Contact Us/Help

Reading Corner

  • Prior Issues
  • Prior Cases
  • Special Updates
  • Bulletins
  • Editorials
  • Memorials
  • FAQs
  • Agency List

Be Social

Resources

  • Donate/Support us
  • Advertise with us
  • Classifieds
  • Honorary Supporters
  • Our Plans
  • White List Us
  • Helpful Links
  • Testimonials

all rights reserved © Copyright protected | legalupdates.com® u.s.r. 6,260.924   | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer & Terms of Use                                                     
Click here to provide Feedback                           

 

  • Home
  • OUR TEAM
  • JOBs/Classifieds
  • Training Portal
  • Login
  • Search

Already have an account? Login Here

Sign up now for free access to this content

Enter your details below and stay ahead of the curve.

We need a little information about you to approve your subscription. We take your privacy seriously. Don’t worry we never share your information with anyone.

Notifications
CAPTCHA

This is to verify you are human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

We take your privacy seriously. As detailed in our Privacy Policy, we do not share your information with anyone. You will be able to update your communication preferences at any time. Please contact Legal Updates if you have any questions or need any assistance.

Login here to access the content

Forgot Password?
We take your privacy seriously. As detailed in our Privacy Policy, we do not share your information with anyone. You will be able to update your communication preferences at any time. Please contact Legal Updates if you have any questions or need any assistance.

We hope you have enjoyed your free trial Professional Membership subscription to Legal Updates. We invite you to continue to receive all our services by upgrading from our Basic to our Professional Membership. You can find a summary of all our plan benefits below. As always, we guarantee full satisfaction and will refund 100% of your payment if you are not satisfied.

Membership Plans

100% SATISFACTION GUARANTEE!

Plan Comparision

BASIC MEMBERSHIP
Complimentary
Limited Access
We still appreciate you!
PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIP
Full Unlimited Access
$15.00/mo ($180.00/year)
Sale! Only $7.50/ mo. ($90.00/year)
Access to our Website
Access to our Website
Receive Updates and Case Alerts
Receive Updates and Case Alerts
Access our library of prior issues and special updates
Access our library of prior issues and special updates
Search Capability
Search Capability
Ability to post comments
Ability to post comments
Print/download/save material from our site
Print/download/save material from our site
Direct access to our authors
Direct access to our authors
Annual Statutes and Changes in the law update (100+ pages)
Annual Statutes and Changes in the law update (100+ pages)
Annual Miranda Update
Annual Miranda Update
Annual Search & Seizure and Fourth Amendment Update (1000+ pages) Our most comprehensive and popular update! A must have for Judges, prosecutors, and police supervisors
Annual Search & Seizure and Fourth Amendment Update (1000+ pages) Our most comprehensive and popular update! A must have for Judges, prosecutors, and police supervisors
Annual Professional Training Certificate (12 Hours of training in legal updates)*
Annual Professional Training Certificate (12 Hours of training in legal updates)*
KEEP CURRENT PLAN

NEWSLETTER

Enter your email and would like to subscribe to our monthly updates.

Stay informed - subscribe to our newsletter.
CAPTCHA

This is to verify you are human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.