Does Using Spotlights or High Beams Amount to Restricting a Contact’s Movement?

FROM THE CLASSROOM 
By Ray Hill 
Professor Emeritus, Santa Rosa Junior College 

Illuminating the Contact Scene 

A former student of mine had a 1538 motion where the public defender centered questioning on the use of high beams, spotlight and “take down” lights during a contact. The defense argued that “over illumination” objectively restrained the person’s freedom of movement. The contact occurred in the upper reaches of a Guerneville canyon, which at night is like working on the dark side of the moon. As it ended up, the individual was carrying a hammer in his belt, had warrants, and a search revealed meth and a smoking pipe.  

The judge dismissed the motion to suppress.  

A reminder of the case law in this area: 

The California Supreme Court has approved the use of high beams and a spotlight during a contact. The decision takes precedence over previous DCA decisions that questioned whether spotlighting and its use would objectively restrain a person’s freedom of movement. 

A San Joaquin County sheriff’s deputy pulled behind a legally parked vehicle on a Stockton residential street in an area known for narcotics sales. Three occupants were seated in the car, the windows were partially down and smoke was emanating from the window openings. The officer parked his patrol car 15 to 20 feet ....