CASE ALERT: Clarity in New Ruling on Dissuading a Victim Access to a Phone

By Ray Hill
Professor emeritus, Santa Rosa Junior College

Ruling

Defendant’s Act of Turning Off a Victim’s Cell Phone and Denying Her Access Supports a Conviction for Preventing or Dissuading a Victim from Reporting a Crime (136.1(b)(1) P.C.) (Peo. v. Sherman (2022) 2022 WL 17726696; 2022 Cal App. Lexis 1022).

Case Background

Victim was visiting the United States from Mexico for the first time. Defendant posed as an Uber driver and picked up the victim. (He had previously worked for Uber and Lyft and the company decals were still on his car windows.) He drove victim to a remote location, parked and lunged into the back seat, held the victim down, pulled down her pants and underwear, and attempted to rape her. Defendant’s DNA was found on the victim’s underwear. During the attack, the victim was able to gain possession of her cell phone. Defendant grabbed the phone, turned it off, said “I’m not going to let you have it” and put it aside. When the victim told the defendant she was pregnant, he returned to the front seat, drove to another location, ....

© 2026 Legal Updates, LLC.
This content is protected by copyright law. Republishing or redistribution in any form without written permission is strictly prohibited. For licensing or reprint requests, contact support@legalupdates.com.