Court Rules Whether Online Threats Sent to Someone Other Than the Victim Constitute Stalking
In a new social media stalking ruling, an appeals court ruled on whether harassing and threatening public Facebook posts focused on a former girlfriend constituted stalking – even though they were sent to someone other than the victim. The case explores the requirements for a “credible threat” being “directed at a victim
In This ‘From the Classroom,’ We Examine the Nuance of Menace, Duress or Fear in a Forcible Rape Appeal
In a ruling this month, the Fourth District examined evidence in a rape case where the defendant used corporal punishment, isolation and threats of God’s retribution to force intercourse with his two daughters. Is a psychological threat of retribution akin to the direct use of force or fear? Read inside to learn more.
De Facto Arrests: What Are They, When Does a Detention Become an Arrest and What Facts Determine It?
This ruling looks at a detention where officers see a gun in the back of a car and handcuff a detainee, but otherwise lack probable cause to arrest him. The court explored whether using handcuffs converts a lawful detention into an illegal de facto arrest. Key context includes safety of the officer and public.
Qualified Immunity: Court Rules on Immunity When Suspect Was Fatally Shot Holding Knife to Own Throat
Court looks to 2011 case to determine an officer was not entitled to qualified immunity after shooting a suspect holding a knife to his own neck, even as he approached the officer. Legal Updates provides resources to help you understand previous rulings that raise the specter of potential civil liability on the job.
Must You Call for Medical Assistance for a Detainee? If You Don’t, You May Find Yourself on a Limb
A new ruling from the Ninth Circuit brings the Fourth Amendment, timely medical care and qualified immunity into the equation of when a police officer must seek health care for a detainee or arrestee. Not doing so when a solo-crash drive had suffered a stroke delayed medical care that may have prevented lifelong injuries.
The Necessity Defense: Choosing Between the Lesser of Two Evils Is Not as Simple as You Might Think
A lost and thirsty hiker sets three wildfires hoping to attract rescuers. As his food and water ran out and his condition worsened, he set a third. He was ultimately rescued but charged with several crimes. Did his “necessity defense” work? Read more inside to learn more about this rare defense, the trial and the appeals verd
Key Legal Ruling: Forced Entry into Exterior Vehicle Cabinets Now Constitutes Burglary 2nd
Appellate Court upholds a Burglary 2nd conviction for a defendant who forcibly entered exterior, permanently mounted utility truck compartments. This ruling clarifies that breaking into secured areas like these is equivalent to forced entry into a vehicle, even if physically separate from the interior.
Deadly Force, Liability and Negligence Highlight Circuit Court Decision in Nevada Case
Home Page Summary In a split decision from December, the Ninth Circuit drills down on issues of deadly force, qualified immunity, whether a parent can claim loss of relationship after officers shot and killed their adult child. This case provides room for debate on whether the officers opted for deadly force too quickly.
Court Ruling Upholds Traffic Stop Prolongation, Seizure of Vehicle, and Enforcement of Federal Law
In United States v. Steinman, the Ninth Circuit ruled that a traffic stop can be extended when reasonable suspicion of additional criminal activity arises. The Court upheld the seizure of a vehicle based on probable cause and affirmed that state officers can enforce federal law, reversing the district court’s decision to supp
Can a tenant allow entry where the co-tenant fails to expressly consent, but does not object?
Read more about this case concerning consensual entry when a co-resident doesn’t voice an objection. On appeal, the defendant also raised questions about whether the search of his person and surroundings, and the physical opening of his cellphone were constitutional.