Death Penalty Case Rules on Photo Lineups, IDs, Miranda, Sixth Amendment, Speedy Trial, Racial Justice

• Photographic lineup identifications 
• Potentially prejudicial in-court identifications 
• Miranda invocations and reinitiation of an interrogation 
• A criminal defendant’s right to testify and the Sixth Amendment 
• Constitutional and statutory speedy trial rights 
• The California Racial Justice Act of 2020 

(1) Showing a crime victim a “sixpack” photo lineup, instead of showing the photos sequentially, and where the investigator showing the lineup knows who the suspect is instead of administering a “blind” lineup, is constitutionally permissible.  

(2) An in-court witness identification of a defendant is legally sufficient so long as it is based upon the witness’ “independent recollection.”  

(3) When an in-custody suspect freely reinitiates communication with law enforcement, resulting incriminating statements are admissible against him in court despite an earlier invocation of his Miranda rights.  

(4) A criminal defendant has the right to testify, even over the objection of his attorney. However, that decision has to be made known to the trial court before the end of the trial, thus allowing the court to counsel the defendant concerning his or her rights.  

(5) A criminal defendant is entitled to ....